Anna Nicole Clips

Archive for the ‘Howard K Stern’ Category

Friends, I am so sorry. I just couldn’t bear watching the trial thinking that Howard was going to get off scott free. It really pained me. His family’s money, his knowledge of all the legal loop holes – I didn’t keep the faith.

Watching this video brings me much joy. It really does. Ok, unfortunately you can’t watch this video. It is news and it is being yanked off YouTube as fast as it is uploaded. LOL

But you get the idea. Oh Glory Day, I am one happy camper. Apparently Howard K. Stern and the psychiatrist only got 2 and 4 counts, respectively. Her physician got off scott free, but it was Howard that really chapped my arse (if you know what I mean.)

Folks — 2 out of 3 ain’t Bad!!

Now we can get back to remembering Anna the way she was before all of the horrid things started happening in her life. This site wasn’t meant to be a news blog. It really wasn’t. It turned out that way for awhile, but I had a hard time bringing myself to report this trial. I am simply so happy right now I can’t control myself.

Will add more on Anna in the future. Now I can start working this site again. Please visit back soon. Hee Hee, justice actually prevailed this time. I am still in shock!

__________

This trial will be re-evaluated in early 2011.

Larry Birkhead is auctioning approx. 250 personal belongings from her estate, include Anna’s outfits, paintings and a collection of Marilyn Monroe memorabilia (Anna’s idol). According to Larry the items cost $100K to store and it’s time to get rid of some of them.

Proceeds will go to charity and a trust fund for their daughter, Dannielynn Birkhead.

According to eOnline:

Now, let’s get specific. Here are some of the items up for grabs and what they’re expected to fetch:

• Genie costume worn during launch party for season one DVD of the E! reality hit The Anna Nicole Smith Show ($1,000-$1,500)
• 1992 Mercedes-Benz 300SL roadster gifted to her from J. Howard Marshall ($10,000-$15,000)
• Anna Nicole original still life painting of flowers ($150-$250)
• Andy Warhol-style portrait of Anna Nicole ($400-$600)
• Bronze and marble “Thomas the Rymer” sculpture of a knight on a horse ($2,000-$3,000)
• Pink feathered doggy bed for Sugar Pie, Anna Nicole’s miniature poodle ($200-$400)
• Silk screen of idol Marilyn Monroe ($1,000-$2,000)
• Fox fur full-length coat (don’t worry, PETA knew about it and they were cool) given to her by late oil baron husband J. Howard Marshall ($1,500-$2,000)
• Original hand-painted rendition of Bubbles, a Powerpuff Girl, smoking a cigarette—or as Birkhead called it, “a dazed and confused Powerpuff Girl” ($150-$250)
• 1993 candy apple red Honda Shadow VT1100C motorcycle ($6,000-$8,000)
• Pink halter dress worn during 2004 Heatherette runway show during Fashion Week, in which Anna Nicole debuted her weight loss ($500-$700)
• Red velvet robe dress with faux fur trim, worn during 2002 Christmas special of E! reality show ($500-$1,000)

Howard K. Stern, the executor of her Anna’s estate is helping Larry with the auction. Julien’s Auctions will run the sale June 26th at Planet Hollywood.

WOW, I guess I really haven’t been keeping up with the trial and all its elements. I just got this article yesterday from my daily Google alerts. I am really surprised at the extent of which all of the accused parties had to go to prescribe and procure the drugs. It seemed many professionals had noticed what was happening and they had the “balls” for lack of a better word, to say “no!”.

Taken From: Affidavits: 3 pharmacists warned Anna Nicole Smith’s doctors about overprescribing drugs

Documents: Anna Nicole Smith’s doctors were warned

LOS ANGELES — A Los Angeles pharmacist told Anna Nicole Smith’s internist that the drugs the internist prescribed to the model after her son died were “pharmaceutical suicide,” according to unsealed documents written by state officials.

Smith’s doctors were warned about prescription drugs by three pharmacists, according to unsealed affidavits obtained Monday by the Los Angeles Times.

The pharmacist refused to fill the prescriptions and later recalled thinking, “They are going to kill her with this.”

I guess I just figured it was easy sailing for them to do what they did, but apparently they actually had to work at it. That amazes me. I have been meaning to write an article on the importance of this trial on the current state of affairs within the medical profession as far as prescription drugs go.

I suppose this is the time to dive into that deep water. Here goes…

For anyone who has been following what has been happening with this trial they know that it will be long and drawn out. Now, more than ever, it is important that every aspect of prescribing drugs and it’s implications be scrutinized. Many new laws will come out of this trial. I have surmised that this trial will be the “Roe vs Wade” of this decade. It will have just as much impact on how things are done — that is my opinion.

One upgraded process will be prescription medication tracking systems. This will, undoubtedly, create new jobs in the near future. There will need to be more checks and balances put into place and much more data to enter into the systems. Red tape, red tape.

Controlled Substance Utilization Review and Evaluation System (CURES) allows healthcare professionals and law enforcement officials to make instant checks through an Internet-based system of more than 100 million entries for controlled substances. This system will be revamped, made into a national database I am sure.

The use of pseudonyms in procuring prescriptions has been, and will probably continue to be, a tricky element in solving this dilemma. It is illegal to prescribe drugs in the name of anyone but the intended user. Physicians found using pseudonyms have lost their medical licenses and faced criminal charges. Previously doctors and investigators were unable to track or cross reference pseudonyms/aliases used to obtain controlled medications. This is where (CURES) comes in. This is yet another piece of the puzzle that needs to be solved.

The main reason for my belief that this trial is a landmark trial is the onslaught of new cases on this case’s heels. This trial will set precedent to how other trials will proceed. We now have the Michael Jackson case, which is very similar (some will argue this) and then Brittany Murphy (which seems to have been taken off the “he done it” list.) Heath Ledger died of prescription drug overdose in 2008 also. Celebrity addictions are not new, they have been a part of the Hollywood scene for ages.

Perhaps the next “in thing” for Hollywood, or for the world for that matter, should be a “greening movement – i.e., non-addictive”. Maybe there should be some sort of incentive for the stars to stay “clean”. Make the benefits great for those who can “walk the walk” so to speak. You can’t get a leading role if you are caught “using” and if you are found to be “using” then you go to the end of the line. Don’t allow the star’s “creative when polluted” reputation cloud your judgment. No means No!

These are crazy thoughts. They naturally would have to include less pressure on our beloved stars to “perform on demand.” The fact that, we, as admirers as well as their “owners – i.e., their agents, etc.” who demand way too much of them. The world needs to take a chill pill and just relax a bit. This hurry scurry life we live is taking it’s tole on everyone. It is easy to understand why stars feel the need for a “pick me up” or a “help – I can’t sleep” pill from time to time. We all need to make some adjustments to keep this sort of thing happening on a regular basis.

Peace out!